Director:
John CarpenterCámara:
Donald M. MorganMúsica:
Jack NitzscheReparto:
Jeff Bridges, Karen Allen, Charles Martin Smith, Richard Jaeckel, Robert Phalen, Tony Edwards, John Walter Davis, Ted White, Dirk Blocker, M.C. Gainey (más)Streaming (2)
Sinopsis(1)
Jeff Bridges da vida a un extraterrestre de un lejano planeta que aprende lo que significa estar enamorado. Cuando su nave es abatida en Wisconsin, Starman llega al recóndito refugio de una joven y desconsolada viuda, Jenny Hayden, y adopta la forma de su marido fallecido. El extraterrestre convence a Jenny para que le lleve hasta Arizona, diciéndole que si no es rescatado por la nave nodriza en el plazo de tres días, él morirá. (Columbia Films S.A.)
(más)Videos (1)
Reseñas (4)
La emocionante historia de un náufrago (Jeff Bridges, nominado al Oscar) que quiere volver a casa. ¿Que este es un tema que se repite muchas veces hoy en día? Sí, sin embargo, John Carpenter ha puesto su estilo y sensación únicos en Starman, el hombre de las estrellas, por lo que en muchos momentos esta película de ciencia ficción te agarra el corazón y se destaca entre las demás. Y el final está bellamente estilizado. Es una amable nostalgia.
()
I didn't expect anything from this film, but John Carpenter surprised me once again. Besides choosing a rather interesting subject matter, which is primarily a romance but also serves as social criticism, the humor presented here is charming and graceful, although in John's case, that's not always the case. Jeff Bridges and Karen Allen are a great couple who work delightfully. Jeff gives one of his many incredible performances here.
()
The hot potato of Starman's long-circulating script, which needed to get on screens as quickly as possible after the success of E.T., landed in Carpenter's lap because he supposedly wanted to try something a little different with the characters and their relationships, but in retrospect even he admits that this was mainly due to the fact that he simply didn't have much to choose from after the disastrous reception of The Thing. In the end, Starman impresses the most with its original, sometimes quite epic special effects (the fall of the UFO into the forest is luxuriously grandiose, the subsequent formation of the alien into a human being is again rather disgustingly uncanny) and its appealing inclusion of various B-movie archetypes and situations. But I don't at all swallow the romance between the alien being, with grimaces resembling a bad trip trying to break through layers of Botox through which he utters phrases like "Define beautiful", "Define love", or "I gave you a baby." Ugh. The general poignancy of a childlike, guileless protagonist who unravels our life certainties with the kindness of simple questions, combined with an Oscar nomination (say whaaaaaaaaat?!), reminds us once again of the need to succumb to these little princes and their simple truths, because it's just easier than slowly and patiently unraveling and defining one's complicated and chaotic existence. Plus, thanks to this movie, another insufferable space smartass has fallen from the sky, prot, so the black spot for this one.
()
By the mid-80s, John Carpenter was a well-established director of stylish B-movies that had a respectable commercial reception within their means. As a result, he was given the opportunity to direct a generously budgeted sci-fi film for a major studio about the arrival of an alien on our planet. Although I consider Carpenter a solid director and don't see the film's weakness in his direction, the movie didn't impress me when I saw it in the movie theater. The problem lies in the screenplay and the overall approach to the topic. It’s a bland sci-fi romance that often elicited a bemused smile and, in one instance, even a chuckle from me - particularly when Karen Allen's character learns that their son will one day be an engineer. Overall impression: 45%.
()
Anuncio