Director:
Hideo NakataCámara:
Gabriel BeristainReparto:
Naomi Watts, Simon Baker, David Dorfman, Emily VanCamp, Sissy Spacek, Ryan Merriman, Shannon Cochran, Gary Cole, Kelly Overton, James Lesure, Daveigh Chase (más)Streaming (2)
Sinopsis(1)
La historia se inicia seis meses después de los terribles acontecimientos que sembraron el pánico en Rachel Keller y su hijo Aidan en Seattle. Para tratar de olvidarlo todo, Rachel se muda con Aidan a la pequeña comunidad costera de Astoria, en Oregón. Pero su intento de comenzar de nuevo se revela ilusorio cuando se produce un nuevo crimen en la localidad asociado con la aparición de una cinta de video anónima... Rachel se da cuenta de que la vengativa Samara ha regresado, más empeñada que nunca en proseguir con su implacable ciclo de terror y muerte. (United International Pictures)
(más)Reseñas (7)
The same cassette, the same Rachel and Aidan, the same gloomy "neither night nor day" atmosphere, the same musical background. And Hideo Nakata didn't pull it off as well. The plot itself is already absurd, and from the trailer, it is more or less clear that the film had to fall apart at some point, which eventually happens with the unnecessary detour to Samara's mother. However, it is precisely the connection to the visual style of the first film that gives it the feeling of a cohesive story. Besides, when I remember the deer or the fateful well, it immediately gives me goosebumps and convinces me that The Ring Too is definitely not the disaster I predicted it to be. However, I wouldn't venture into further experiments because it could split a treacherous crack in the aura of the first film.
()
Estaba preparado para la decepción, pero no esperaba que ni siquiera iba a tener ganas de escribir la reseña. Al principio hay algunas posibilidades de desarrollo de la historia prometedoras, pero con la subsiguiente ración de escenas tópicas y sin sentido, la confianza del espectador decae y cuando viene el final, ya todo le da igual. Curva completamente opuesta a la primera película. El guión no es más que una papilla hecha con más agua, intentando a toda costa encontrar algo a lo que agarrarse en el tema anterior. El personaje de Samara ya no tiene peso, el miedo funciona al 30% (si funcionaba al 90% en la primera película) y falla a menudo a costa de la confianza del director en la funcionalidad de los efectos digitales, que antes no podía permitirse y que ahora por desgracia son completamente interesados. Lo único positivo: la «sensación sobrenatural» inicial que culmina en una gran escena de ciervos, una fotografía decente, un excelente tema central de Hans Zimmer y la siempre guapa Naomi Watts.
()
Technically brilliantly filmed, unatmospheric boredom. The main problem is that it completely lacks the atmosphere of part one. This is mainly due to the incredibly dumb screenplay that is all sixes and sevens, absolutely ignoring the rules laid down last time round. Here “fear" is invoked by randomly located, cheap, non-functional frights. The actors have nothing at all to act, so they are stylized into one common expression, and that unfortunately includes Naomi. It is painfully obvious in her performance that if she weren’t bound by contract, she wouldn’t have played in it, given the choice. Only two scenes of the entire two hours of running time are worthy of mention. One for its incredible dumbness (the scene at the university) and one coolly made scene with the bath and the water on the ceiling. I think that Nakata wanted to put an end to remakes of Asian pictures and so he sacrificed himself, putting his reputation on the line and filmed this pile of codswallop to end up on the shelves at the very back of the video rental stores: I see no other logical explanation...
()
Overcast, with occasional Samara... Unpleasant Oregon weather, a few scenes where carpets and floors had to be dried out, one missed "Beware of Digital Wildlife" sign, a small role for Sissy Spacek, still haunted by water since The River with Gibson, and a predictable finale in a well with climbing holds. It's worth noting that the screenwriter tossed the director of the Japanese original into the well, but he didn't climb out... Samara and her phenomenon are already decaying; in The Ring 3, the small, pale Igor Chmela would be the only scary thing left.
()
Solidly shot wholes/half-parts clash with utterly incompetently shot details in this aesthetically very uneven work. But the camera impotence and the inability to captivate are nothing compared to the stupidity of the script, which has more logical errors than holes in Swiss cheese. And even the idea itself – if it can be called that at all – is rather laughable.
()
A typical sequel. The screenwriters apparently decided to give the first part a good beating, they wanted everything to be even more gripping, shocking and scary, but somehow it didn’t go beyond the effort. The Ring 2 doesn't have nearly the atmosphere of fear that Verbinski's film could boast, all the scares are forced and unsuccessful, the director serves one cliché after another, ultimately drowning the great performances and plot potential. The story digs its own grave from the beginning, sinking deeper and deeper into it, despite the great effort to scare the viewer and keep a true horror face. A big pompous sequel trying to capitalize on the success of the excellent first one, which, while watchable, is still best avoided.
()
The Ring Two marked the beginning of declining interest in Japanese horror. It was a gradual decline because even today there are people who seek out Japanese horror movies, but the interest is not as huge anymore. It's logical. In The Ring Two, Hideo Nakata seems to be repeating himself and trying to come up with an interesting ending but ends up drowning in the overall meaning of the story. And the worst part is that the only scene that scares is the one with the deer.
()
Anuncio