Streaming (1)
Sinopsis(1)
A través del seguimiento exhaustivo del día a día del protagonista, el director nos plantea un experimento diseñado para intentar responder, en el cine y en la sociedad, como un hombre solitario puede llegar a generar tanto odio y resentimiento. Un sincero acercamiento no sólo a Daliborek sino a miles de personas como él, que crean y ajustan su visión del mundo en el odio y el miedo a los demás. (Filmin)
(más)Reseñas (7)
I definitely wasn’t amazed by The White World According to Daliborek, but I have to admit that it's definitely an interesting look at one man and his family. You can see that it's very easy to be dysfunctional and still function. That is an amazing paradox. You can also see how people can adopt opinions and consider them the truth, yet in the end, you still get the feeling that it's just posturing.
()
¿Película de terror social? ¿Ciencia ficción pervertida? No, es la realidad. De Prostějov. Exigente para la mente y casi para el estómago.
()
Explotación oportunista conscientemente disfrazada de documental serio. Aunque The White World According to Daliborek ofrece temas interesantes y apremiantes sobre los que reflexionar, su enfoque creativo socava todo el mensaje y lo convierte en una farsa artificial sin gracia. Es una especie de camino entre programas de la televisión checa como Policie v akci (Policía en acción) e Výměna manželek (Intercambio de esposas), por lo que para mí fue todo un calvario. Y el artificioso final, en el que el director entra heroicamente en una pelea que él mismo ha montado, es un fracaso creativo total.
()
No es un documental que comente sobre la comunidad neonazi en general a través del personaje de Dalibor, porque Dalibor es demasiado único para ello, por lo que ni los neonazis ni nadie más se identificará con él ni con sus puntos de vista. Es fácil reírse de Dalibor y sus acciones, pero también hay mucha compasión y quizás arrepentimiento en esa risa, no es posible señalarlo con el dedo y etiquetarlo como un sucio xenófobo nazi, que merece ser pateado. Además de los eslóganes odiosos y racistas de Dalibor y su producción de videos desperdiciada, la película también revela mucha información de su privacidad, señalando de qué se trata en gran medida esta película: personas acomplejadas e internamente infelices que no están contentas con su estilo de vida, con su trabajo ni con sus antecedentes, pero quieren desesperadamente pertenecer a algún lugar, y de esta manera recurren a grupos con opiniones más extremistas. Estas opiniones generalmente obtienen de los medios en línea “alternativos” y de otras personas de ideas afines, dependientes de forma subsistente de la televisión y de las redes sociales como única forma de entretenimiento disponible. Y probablemente hay muchas de esas personas en la sociedad checa y eslovaca, solo que Dalibor llega hasta la médula y, gracias a él, ver una película no solo es una visión excepcional de un determinado sector de la sociedad, sino que al mismo tiempo es una diversión a veces escandalosa. La escena, es fabulosa, pero también es escabrosa.
()
52nd KVIFF – I am not sure if Vít Klusák made this documentary so that he could poke fun at Daliborek or, as he claimed, so that he could confront him with reality. Daliborek actually isn’t bad, he only deduced a couple of his own truths and didn’t manage to realize that those truths of his could be, in reality, diametrically different. And thus, it’s hard to convince a person who thinks they found the greatest truth of all even though they are completely spinning the facts that are commonplace nowadays. The trip to Auschwitz and the confrontation with the lady who survived Auschwitz, are, by the way, the director’s masterpieces. However, I return to Mr. Klusák and my final impression, of which I am not sure if it is good or bad. The fact that this documentary looks more like a movie convinces me of the negative. I have a feeling that, if not everything, then at least most of it is only acted out for the sake of the cameras. And it fascinates me that apart from Daliborek, the whole family took part in this game. On the other hand, I laughed and also got horrified. I laughed because Daliborek had, at times, genius catchphrases, and got horrified at how dumb some people around us can be. However, it isn’t only Daliborek, there are loads of people like him around us. It isn’t only about stubbornness but also about the narrow-mindedness of each of us that needs to be suppressed. Nevertheless, the documentary fascinated me and became the highlight of the whole festival. Maybe it will make Dalibor and the people around him think if nothing else.
()
Vít Klusák made his method something I would call a "lazy and cowardly docu-arrangement". Choose an antisocial whose manifestations are on the verge of mild mental retardation, let him replay (I can't shake the impression that Daliborek is playing himself poorly) episodes that feel like Extreme Family type exploitations (but without admitted ridicule through voice over), create a panopticon saying nothing, etc. I just don't think it's anything bold, revealing and provocative. As a result, The White World According to Daliborek reveals nothing but an annoying exhibition of a bald mama's boy. I would probably forget about it. I've wasted my time with worse bullshit. But the arranged Auschwitz ZOO with the director's moral stepping out in front of the camera... that’s an insurmountable mistake to me. Klusák directs the weak-hearted idiot for an hour and a half, so that in the end he can give him a moral slap and thus cancel the last hint that this documentary has some concept and observational value. It doesn't. It is a weak conglomeration of meaningless nonsense and excesses that does not function either as a character study or as a documentary about the radical thinking of ordinary people. That the audience laughs amusedly and arrogantly speaks much more about the level of society-wide debate than about the qualities of the documentary. For the first time ever, I am reporting Klusák's fail. And it really is colossal.
()
It is completely unnecessary to devote a full-length documentary to this topic. The theme in the form this simple simpleton from Prostějov culminates in the simple message that the one who spews hateful nonsense is in fact the harmless immature son of a naive mother. Once again, Klusák works only with empty phrases and (unintentional?) grotesqueness. Why confront a so-called neo-Nazi with the facts and pay any attention to him? This kind of person is indeed an annoying insect, but in fact only harms itself. His life is going nowhere, but he also doesn't vote, doesn't participate in demonstrations, and simply survives on his delusions and mistakes. We have more interesting and serious phenomena in society than this. The first ladies of our documentary filmmaking are able to create stories and statements in their films that have value. If Klusák shares this ambition, he hasn't been working on it for at least the last decade. Unfortunate.
()
Anuncio