Director:
Gabriele MuccinoGuión:
Steve ConradCámara:
Phedon PapamichaelMúsica:
Andrea GuerraReparto:
Will Smith, Jaden Smith, Thandiwe Newton, Kurt Fuller, James Karen, Brian Howe, Dan Castellaneta, David Fine, Mark Christopher Lawrence (más)Streaming (4)
Sinopsis(1)
Chris Gardner (Will Smith) es un padre de familia que lucha por sobrevivir. A pesar de sus valientes intentos para mantener a la familia a flote, la madre (Thandie Newton) de su hijo de cinco años Christopher (Jaden Smith) comienza a derrumbarse a causa de la tensión constante de la presión económica; incapaz de soportarlo, en contra de sus sentimientos, decide marcharse. Chris, convertido ahora en padre soltero, tenazmente continúa buscando un trabajo mejor pagado empleando todas las tácticas comerciales que conoce. Consigue unas prácticas en una prestigiosa correduría de bolsa y, a pesar de no percibir ningún salario, acepta con la esperanza de finalizar el plan de estudios con un trabajo y un futuro prometedor. Sin colchón económico alguno, pronto echan a Chris y a su hijo del piso en el que viven y se ven obligados a vivir en centros de acogida, estaciones de autobús, cuartos de baño o allá donde encuentren refugio para pasar la noche. A pesar de sus preocupaciones, Chris continúa cumpliendo sus obligaciones como padre y se muestra cariñoso y comprensivo, empleando el afecto y la confianza que su hijo ha depositado en él como incentivo para superar los obstáculos a los que se enfrenta. (Sony Pictures Esp.)
(más)Reseñas (7)
Una triste «película de la vida» que te dice que no estás solo y que algún día las cosas irán mejor. Melancólica, de ritmo lento, pero no aburrida. La película está impulsada por la centrada interpretación de Will Smith, que retrata con brillantez todas las posturas de un hombre atormentado. Es él quien eleva la película por encima de la media. Una persona que no hubiera pasado por algo parecido en su juventud no lo interpretaría de una tan manera creíble.
()
A big surprise for me. I knew Will Smith could act well, but I didn’t expect that the ordinary story about a man trying to come back to normal life from rock bottom could be made in such an entertaining and fresh way. Although I approached the film with skepticism at the beginning, at the end I was left with nothing but satisfaction from a job well done without any major mistakes.
()
Out of the frying pan, into the fire... Chris Gardner’s life in a nutshell. The Pursuit of Happyness has just three shortcomings, but they are so serious that they make this potentially good movie into a wreck that has nothing to offer. The first is the overly-long running time, then it’s the rather lackadaisical and plodding directing and then the main protagonist. Although Will Smith’s acting is perfect as usual and his character is absolutely convincing. Which, rather paradoxically, is the biggest problem because he plays the most awfully unpleasant central character that the silver screen has ever seen. Sycophantic, incapable of providing for his family, ingratiating, bothersome, selfish, dumb (he has no common sense at all). Simply the kind of guy that everyone would despise. I couldn’t shake the feeling throughout the movie that he does everything just for himself and his son just stumbled randomly into this situation. When I think about how much this is idealized and far from reality, I am surprised that anybody wanted to make a movie about a guy like that. But the truth is that it is a story about reforging the American Dream into reality. Something that we have already seen countless times with protagonists that I felt I could wish all the success in the world to. A sub-average movie with excellent actors and a neat soundtrack. It’s not unbearable, but it’s totally superfluous.
()
If anyone doubted Will Smith's acting ability, his next cinematic detour should go exactly here. It is a not-so-surprising, but instead appealing, sincere, and thanks to the protagonist, easily memorable drama. While watching, you may realize a few life priorities, perhaps sorting out your life. However, I have to at least somewhat face the fact that I have seen it all elsewhere, where it seemed more like trivial things to me. For example, how deeply a single smile in a pizzeria can touch you.
()
The final scene (the first and the last emotions) and the performances of Will Smith and Thandie Newton are brilliant, but the film is very predictable and overly idealistic. But well, these stereotypical stories about how an average Joe became (almost) a king are nothing but inspiration for the masses, where an irresponsible fuck-up of a father manages the family budget to perfection and puts food on the table, until his wife leaves him and he sleeps on toilets in the subway with his son, yet still works hard every day for free to successfully reach the finale. Anyone who takes this melancholic fairytale seriously, they will be in deep trouble in practical life. Very distantly inspired by a true story, just as it suits the tearful audience. Shamefully unsuccessful imitation of a real journey towards a dream, where more than just blindly looking forward is needed. Maybe even around oneself.
()
A beautiful film about hope and overcoming life's pitfalls that manages to grab the heart without insulting the brain or overly assaulting the tear ducts. Will Smith really has outdone himself with an excellent and heartfelt performance, and he deserved to be among the Oscar nominees. He is the main reason why the film has such power and I couldn't take my eyes off it, even though it was clear how it would turn out in the end. They should make more films like this, because they can also be very motivational when life is not going as it should. This one at least does it. 85%
()
This film can be viewed as terribly hypocritical - it praises values like work, which is the most important, and treating people like garbage - or as the triumph of one person over fate. I don't know which option to choose, but thanks to Will Smith, I usually lean towards the second one. What's the actual good part of this story anyway? That he finds work with people who initially show him a certain respect as a person, but are otherwise ruthless scoundrels and essentially slave drivers? Is the film really that critically intentional, or did it turn out that way by mistake? If it's intentional, then I take my hat off. If it wasn't intentional, then it's great that it turned out the way it did.
()
Anuncio