Director:
Ridley ScottGuión:
Brian HelgelandCámara:
John MathiesonMúsica:
Marc StreitenfeldReparto:
Russell Crowe, Cate Blanchett, Max von Sydow, William Hurt, Mark Strong, Oscar Isaac, Danny Huston, Eileen Atkins, Mark Addy, Matthew Macfadyen, Kevin Durand (más)Streaming (5)
Sinopsis(1)
En la Inglaterra del siglo XIII, Robin y su banda de ladrones luchan contra la corrupción en una pequeña ciudad, hasta el punto de enfrentarse a la corona y cambiar el reparto de poder entre el rey y sus súbditos. Héroe o forajido, un hombre de humilde cuna se convertirá en un símbolo de libertad para su pueblo. "Robin Hood" relata la vida de un experto arquero al que sólo le interesaba proteger su vida mientras estaba al servicio del rey Ricardo Corazón de León. Al morir el rey, Robin vuelve a Nottingham, una ciudad aplastada por los impuestos recaudados por un sheriff despótico. Allí se enamora de lady Marion, una mujer que duda de la identidad y de las motivaciones de este cruzado del bosque. Decidido a conquistar el corazón de la dama y a salvar la ciudad, Robin reúne a una banda cuyas inesperadas habilidades sólo son igualadas por sus ganas de vivir. (Universal Pictures España)
(más)Videos (4)
Reseñas (12)
Uno diría que Robin Hood tiene cierto potencial de entretener al público, además, las localizaciones son bonitas y el elenco es excepcional (especialmente el súper villano Mark Strong). Simplemente es difícil aceptarlo como otro fruto de la colaboración de Scott + Crowe, de la cual estamos acostumbrados a películas más maduras, más ambiciosas y de calidad superior, además del fuerte toque autoral del director. Porque Robin Hood es (al menos en esta versión cinematográfica) solo sencillo, ideológicamente ingenuo, una posible peli de verano sin una pizca de originalidad. Crowe vuelve a tocar letárgicamente la tierra arrasada o camina por un campo de maíz, pero el espectador esta vez no siente nada. No me gusta la holgazanería y el enfoque impersonal y rutinario de la realización cinematográfica, especialmente de los cineastas para quienes las imágenes cinematográficas suelen ser lo máximo y que saben que el mundo espera de ellos algo más.
()
Loads of money wasted on a pointless, sterile and lifeless film. Scott is still a master of the craft, but that doesn’t mean anything if has to work with a screenwriting monstrosity that doesn’t even allow the beautiful Cate Blanchet or the charismatic Strong to express themselves properly. In short, two and a half hours of delayed sleep and bitter memories of the never made Nottingham. Ridley, please, go back to the Aliens and make me happy this time.
()
I was too content to be disappointed, but... I expect rather more from Ridley than a slipshod, while entertaining historical snack. I don’t doubt that in a year and a day we’ll see the release of a dozens of minutes longer and countless percent better director’s cut. Because mainly the editor had to do inhumane overtime on the second half and so in many places it doesn’t make too much sense. But it isn’t ridiculous, not at all (apart from the lady charging on the pony, huh?). The reason why Robin Hood is worth seeing isn’t sumptuous production design (there is none, anyhow) or monumental battles (there are none, anyhow), but the electrifying courting chemistry of the central two. Despite all of potential for mediocrity, I would certainly like to see a part two. Or, better still, I want Scott to give us a whole new movie about Richard played by Huston! P.S.: And although this has almost nothing to do with the legend, still it is a hair’s breadth closer to it than what they did in the version starring Costner.
()
It's nice to see a film on the screen where bytes are not being smashed against each other, but where a massive ensemble is pushing conquering battering rams and stuntmen in fireproof suits are falling from the walls. The trailer was off-putting, while Ridley’s name was carrying it. I don't regret the money in favor of honest filmmaking, which compromises on ratings and, in the second half, on the tolerability of the runtime (I will, like many, be looking out for the DVD with the extended bloodier version), but otherwise entertains with well-written and acted characters that you fully believe in. Crowe’s pathetic charisma drips throughout, while the rest of the gang spit out dry catchphrases and Cate Blanchett is breathtaking. That's what makes even the romantic storyline pleasant and spirited. In a way, it's nothing we haven't seen from Ridley before, but his paintings have always had eyes boring into them, and Robin Hood isn't going to change that.
()
I'm trying to find adequate words for this repulsive and bloated screenwriting conglomerate, brought to total impotence by Ridley Scott's trembling hand. I am struck by words such as despair, embarrassment, lack of criticism, anachronism and ideological naivety bordering on simplicity. It can be roughly summarized as follows: Robin Hood was caught in the woods and sodomized with a loud reading of Marx's Capital. What was quite cute in Kingdom of Heaven is offensive and boring in this film. Only Max von Sydow stands out from the weak attempts at heroism. In a single scene, Max demonstrates what the rest of the film is hunting for in vain in the soulless theft from Shakespeare, The Lord of the Rings and about five thousand other films. One star out of sheer disrespect for Scott, who should either get bigger scissors, or leave history alone. It’s already taken a decent beating from him.
()
Galería (120)
Foto © Universal Pictures
![Robin Hood - De la película](http://image.pmgstatic.com/cache/resized/w663/files/images/film/photos/160/116/160116171_860bc4.jpg)
Anuncio