Director:
M. Night ShyamalanGuión:
M. Night ShyamalanCámara:
Tak FujimotoMúsica:
James Newton HowardReparto:
Mark Wahlberg, Zooey Deschanel, John Leguizamo, Ashlyn Sanchez, Betty Buckley, Spencer Breslin, Frank Collison, Jeremy Strong, Alan Ruck (más)Streaming (4)
Sinopsis(1)
Para el profesor de ciencias en un instituto de Filadelfia Elliot Moore, lo más importante de todo es encontrar el modo de escapar de este misterioso y letal fenómeno. Aunque él y su mujer Alma están atravesando una crisis en su matrimonio, se ponen en camino, primero en tren, luego en coche, con Julian, amigo de Elliot y profesor de Matemáticas y Jess, la hija de ocho años de edad de éste, hacia las tierras de labranza de Pennsylvania, donde esperan estar a salvo de los horribles y cada vez más frecuentes ataques. Aunque muy pronto queda claro que nadie y en ninguna parte está seguro. Este aterrador e invisible asesino no puede ser evitado. Es únicamente cuando Elliot empieza a entender la verdadera naturaleza de de lo que está acechando ahí fuera (y lo que ha desatado esa fuerza que amenaza el futuro de la humanidad), cuando descubre un atisbo de esperanza creyendo que su familia quizás pueda librarse de lo que está ocurriendo. (20th Century Fox España)
(más)Reseñas (12)
Así que, por desgracia... el trabajo del director Shyamalan en la creación de suspense está presente aquí (casa encantada con una casera espeluznante) y tienta a una calificación de 3*, pero falta todo lo demás esencial. El motivo amoroso no funciona y la relación de los protagonistas es incomprensible. Ni rastro de diálogos interesantes y remate final. El incidente es una farsa insulsa, a veces de suspense y a veces ingenua, hervida de agua, salpimentada con la música de Howard de Señales.
()
Supongo (y podría estar equivocado) que para una película tan deprimente, M. Night Shyamalan quiso escribir algunos diálogos extraños para aligerar el ambiente con humor. Sin embargo, lo que surgió carece de toda intención creativa. Los discursos de los personajes no tienen sentido, en momentos completamente inapropiados, sobre cosas estúpidas y pronunciados por actores realmente inapropiados. Mark Wahlberg y sobre todo Zooey Deschanel son una pareja protagonista completamente disfuncional. Y aunque la niña es el tercer personaje principal y está presente casi toda la película, es tan innecesaria que poco a poco te olvidas de que está ahí. Cuando aparece el primer atisbo de un personaje interesante (el jardinero bonachón Frank Collison), que tiene algo que decir, de repente se pone a filosofar sobre la popularidad de los perritos calientes, y a los dos minutos desaparece de la historia. La guinda del pastel es el hecho de que, ante la llegada del apocalipsis y la extinción de millones de personas, lo que más hace sufrir a Alma (Zooey Deschanel) es el remordimiento por haber engañado a su marido (Wahlberg) saliendo a tomar el postre con otro hombre. ¡Madre mía! ¿En qué mundo alternativo puede pasar algo así?
()
It’s a pity that the wind didn’t also engulf Václav Klaus, at least Shymalan's ecological agitprop would have had some useful effect. Now, seriously, Shyamalan hasn't lost his directorial skill and he can still make scenes that give you chills, but the problem here is in two things: the half-baked concept, where logic takes a vacation quite often, and then the leading duo. Mark Wahlberg, as much as I like him, is absolutely unsuited to the role of a high school biology professor and bumbling husband (Mark's pissed-off macho characters are best with a gun in his hand) and whenever he tries to play some serious emotion and speaks up, he ruins all the action on screen with his perpetually furrowed brow and unbelievable speech. Mark, sorry, this didn't work out (and now I’m afraid of Jackson's The Lovely Bones). And Zooey, that doll with big eyes, gives it an even bigger punch. So Shyamalan lost with the casting and the half-baked script, but I'm still a fan.
()
Quite fun. How much you’ll enjoy it will depend on when you give up hope of a chilling thriller to make do with a parody of catastrophe movies. I did it during the first ten minutes and I could watch the rest with a smile on my face. I don’t think there’s any other way to be satisfied, because Shyalaman simply could not mean this seriously. Or maybe he did at first, but when he realised that Wahlberg and Deschanel weren’t the right casting choices, he decided to use them differently and turn the thriller he had planned into the utmost B-movie. What takes the film down very deep are the dialogues and the way the actors utter them, otherwise it would’ve been alright, there’s even some atmosphere here and there. I really want to believe in what I’ve just written, but unfortunately, I’m not that sure. If Happening is so bad unintentionally, we are witnessing an enormous failure by a director. There’s one exchange by the end that gives me some hope that my theory is true. In the scene when Elliot is telling about the time he went to buy cough syrup. Alma: “Are you joking?” (Elliot nods in agreement). Alma: “Thanks.”
()
The only question I have in connection with this film relates to the budget. I’d even suspect Shyamalan of preferring to embezzle a little something into his own pocket as if he suspected that his latest venture (as is slowly becoming his habit) wouldn't even make money. But now more seriously: I was not at all disappointed because this is exactly the kind of intimate thriller I was expecting. Shyamalan plunges ordinary characters into a marginal situation that cannot be properly rationally explained, leaving them groping not only over the question of mysterious deaths but also over their own relationships. These relationships are stressed in the extreme, even if some of the dialogue suffers from "romantic B-movie" syndrome. It's not about bogeymen, it's about questions we need to start asking. PS: At times, Shyamalan and his cinematographer Fujimoto did such great work that I thought about how good it would be if he had made Cormac McCarthy’s The Road.
()
When mom gets pissed, her offspring shakes with fear in the corner. When Mother Nature loses patience, not just human kind, but also good movies and Shya’s reputation go up the spout. Unfortunately. I sincerely don’t give a damn if this is meant seriously or not (of course it is), but the result is neither fish nor fowl. Occasionally ridiculous and unintentionally entertaining and at other moments precisely the type of movie I wanted to see (in a few shots Night comes closer to the atmosphere of “The" Birds by Du Maurier than Hitch himself does). Primarily the atmospheric landscapes with a myriad flowers were really impressive; look out, Gardener’s World. I’m sorry that in many scenes I find myself laughing at my favorite and not with him. But this isn’t downright ridiculous, nor is it boring and definitely not unbearable. But thanks to Wahlberg’s “acting performance", it is unintentionally camp. If it weren’t for him, I would go higher with the marks. And what’s the movie actually like? Hard to pin down. Sometimes it just ends up that way. In my eyes, this is the first and I hope the last time this happens for M. Shit happens. What happened happened. Too bad, today is another day. ♫ OST score: 3/5
()
We get a climax, the story moves forward along a path lined with tension, and the actors guide us through this depressing world with such ease that the hour and a half flies by almost on its own. So why am I staring at ultra-low ratings and reviews that constantly repeat borrowed complaints from reviews about the lack of a climax and total boredom? The Happening is now the third film in a row from M. Night Shyamalan that the public expects to combine The Sixth Sense and Signs and end up with a similarly nerve-wracking affair like those two. And as a result of these expectations, a harsh impact comes. I can understand this mistake with The Village, which I still consider one of the best films of my life, but with the excellent Lady in the Water, I understand it less, but if someone can't learn even on their third try, so be it. Perhaps it would be good to go to the cinema without prejudices and false expectations, and reconciling with the unpredictable Indian master will be on the agenda again.
()
There's a movie… and it's about nothing… but then… Zooey Deschanel walks in… there's a movie… and it's about nothing… but it has its charm. A typical example.
()
Well, I don't know, I'm kind of on the fence about this... If that's supposed to be a warning, it's a pretty lame one... in any case, I see it as the story of two people who didn't get along very well, their marriage stagnated, but thanks to something going on in the background that made them see a lot of dead bodies, they got back together... I guess :D
()
Except for Marky Mark’s somewhat odd performance and my expectation of a more powerful moral than just that people are mostly a bunch of scumbags who deserve to die (btw our Slovak brothers' title ‘Event’, is a catchier than the Czech ‘It Happened’) I quite liked it. The opening scenes, especially the one with the flying workers, are flawless and people behave wonderfully freakishly. Zooey Deschanel was fantastic as was John Leguisam's mathematician. Shy the director still knows how to make a movie. He can create the right atmosphere and so on, but Shy the screenwriter should take a break for a while. Wait for better ideas and prepare a big comeback. Too bad he didn't have a jab at Potter.
()
An ordinary, straightforward, and boring film. And if it wasn’t for the big creaking house with a strange landlady, I wouldn't have even known that it was made by a master of tension and brilliant twists, and the fact that Shyamalan isn't afraid to show the "action" directly this time and doesn't shy away from the camera doesn't suggest this either. So, we have several truly interesting and bloody accidents that are striking and real enough to captivate (construction site, car, combine harvester), but the atmosphere is nonexistent. There are a lot of unnecessary peripheral that make it impossible for the plot to thicken and work on the tension. And the final twist isn’t surprising, either, it was expected considering the name of the director.
()
I'm probably tuned to a different wavelength than most users, but I quite liked The Happening. It doesn't have the feel of The Sixth Sense, Unbreakable or Signs, but it's still a film with a good atmosphere and an appealing "We pissed off nature - now it’s going to get even with us" idea. By the way, the film reminded me in many moments of King's book “Cell" (admit it, Shyamalan, you read it in one sitting too), in which something similar actually happens. Pros for The Happening: Scenes like the workers falling, the suicide shooters, "sleepovers" in the old woman's house, the ending. The actors aren't bad (except for a whole hour and a half of weirdly freaked out Zooey Deschanel), and Newton Howard's music is as good as ever. Cons: In terms of suspense, Shyamalan remains behind his previous films (the wind rustling in the treetops is no match for the cornfields), there is little that is scary, nerve-rattling or unexpected in The Happening... And there is also no particularly shocking point. It gets three stars.
()
Anuncio