Director:
Aaron SorkinGuión:
Aaron SorkinCámara:
Phedon PapamichaelMúsica:
Daniel PembertonReparto:
Eddie Redmayne, Alex Sharp, Sacha Baron Cohen, Jeremy Strong, John Carroll Lynch, Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, Mark Rylance, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ben Shenkman (más)Streaming (1)
Sinopsis(1)
Lo que iba a ser una propuesta pacífica durante la Convención Nacional Demócrata de 1968 se convirtió en una violenta batalla campal con la Policía y la Guardia Nacional. Los organizadores de la protesta, entre los que figuraban Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, Tom Hayden y Bobby Seale, fueron acusados de conspiración para incitar una revuelta, y el juicio posterior fue uno de los más notorios de la historia de Estados Unidos. (Tripictures)
(más)Videos (2)
Reseñas (15)
Estoy muy satisfecho. Y estoy contento de haber aprendido algo más sobre la historia. En general, tenía conocimiento sobre los Panteras Negras, la insatisfacción especial de los jóvenes con la guerra devastadora de Vietnam, pero no tenía idea de estos eventos específicos. ¿A quién destacar en términos de actuación? El elenco es magnífico, Sacha Baron Cohen acapara la mayor atención, algo sorprendente para mí. No puedo dejar de mencionar a mi favorito Eddie Redmayne, al igual que al siempre perfectamente repugnante Frank Langella. Pero sería injusto no destacar también las actuaciones de Jeremy Strong, Mark Rylance o Alex Sharp. Me sorprendió que "El juicio de los 7 de Chicago" no tuviera tanto éxito en los Globos de Oro. Tal vez gane más premios en los Óscar.
()
Una conversación delicadamente escrita, actuada y editada sobre los buenos valores y los malos sistemas de poder, que sorprende con un clímax bastante banal y, para Sorkin, inesperadamente patético. El punto culminante de la película para mí sigue siendo el primer plano largo en la sala del tribunal, seguido de planos estáticos de los presentes en atención después de que el juez entre en la sala.
()
I won’t lie, Netflix finally dropped something that’s instantly grabbing attention and doesn't reek of cheapness. It’s even buzzing with potential Oscar nods. In just under a month, over three thousand people have rated it, and the praise has been pouring in. Naturally, I was excited. But in the end? It’s more average than anything. The subject matter feels very American, and it took me a while to really get what was happening. Not being familiar with the historical context of the Chicago trial in 1968 definitely didn’t help. Plus, I’ve seen courtroom dramas done way better. That said, the performances are the film’s clear highlight—Sacha Baron Cohen, Eddie Redmayne, Mark Rylance, and Frank Langella all shine. The classic, feel-good Hollywood ending was a nice touch too. But beyond that, I expected more. Way more.
()
A history lesson for high school students led by a vain teacher who likes to show how he can popularize an interpretation even at the cost of losing the essentials. It's a courtroom sitcom that still balances on the edge of a caricature. The connection between the court proceedings and the events during the demonstration is laborious in terms of the directing, and the screenplay, despite having a good rhythm, sometimes feels like its showing off. The acting is satisfactory and it's not boring, but for me it doesn't have any deeper impact beyond decent fun, with a somewhat clumsy ambition to become a society-wide event.
()
There are three to four major fundamental scenes where Sorkin's typical continuous flow of words goes silent and the power of the message is fully taken over by the image. And I can't shake the feeling that if Spielberg had shot it (as he originally intended to do more than a decade ago), then it's exactly these scenes that would have made memorable moments. As it stands, however, they are too wishy-washy and without the intended emotional impact. Otherwise, there are no drawbacks; it is another trademark-quality Sorkin movie with all of the good and bad that goes with it. Perhaps it's just an unusually small amount of movement for Sorkin (apart from the opening), which is largely due to the setting. Stunning acting, the depiction of the characters tends somewhat toward caricature, a furious pace, polished dialogue, a refined reality with obvious yet unexpressed overlaps.... Simply put, another Sorkin movie.
()
Anuncio