Director:
Andrew DominikGuión:
Andrew DominikCámara:
Greig FraserReparto:
Brad Pitt, Scoot McNairy, Ben Mendelsohn, Ray Liotta, Richard Jenkins, James Gandolfini, Vincent Curatola, Garret Dillahunt, Sam Shepard, Glen Warner (más)Streaming (2)
Sinopsis(1)
Tres criminales no demasiado inteligentes atracan una partida de póker auspiciada por el hampa, haciendo que la mafia local entre en bancarrota. Brad Pitt interpreta a Jackie Cogan, el único personaje listo de la historia, un matón a sueldo encargado de restablecer el orden y conseguir así que le paguen por matar atracadores. (DeAPlaneta)
(más)Reseñas (8)
Una película de gángsters con un reparto estelar que intenta ser muy original. Pero sus personajes (excepto el tío Brad) son unos bichos raros que no son ni respetables ni graciosos. Y los diálogos carecen de diversión y de chistes (excepto la última línea de Brad). Lo más interesante de la película es el subrayado de la historia de un grupo de delicuentes de medio pelo con frases de los discursos televisivos de George W. Bush o Barrack Obama sobre lo grande que es y será América. Los juegos de palabras visuales y la cámara lenta dan a la película un sello de exclusividad, pero no son nuevos y, francamente, están más a gusto en Los Vengadores. La cámara montada en la puerta del coche, copiando su movimiento de apertura y cierre, ya la tenía Tarantino (y Dios sabe de dónde la sacó). Los juguetones cambios en la narración son agradables, pero en retrospectiva huelen a prepotencia (el personaje de Gandolfini y su importancia en la historia) y al final siguen conduciendo a la solución que suponemos al ver el cartel de la película.
()
“I'm living in America, and in America, you're on your own. America's not a country. It's just a business. Now fucking pay me.” I don't know how this sounds to neo-liberals, but I would chisel these quote in stone.
()
A solid gangster movie. It’s not boring, but I can’t say it’s anything extraordinary. I didn’t get to know enough about any of the characters to really care for them, and it seems that a character that is introduced at the beginning doesn’t appear until the end just to kill someone. Given that in the end they stick a couple of minutes with some sort of message, my complaint could be disregarded by the fact that it’s clearly intentional. But come on! For me, nothing to write home about, no matter how I look at it. Points for the slow-motion shootout in the rain and the scene with the stoned dialogue. Otherwise, the most interesting thing about this film are the elegant posters.
()
It’s a bit boring, but you still get the bad boy Brad Pitt, who’ll get his head spinning trying to solve a pretty complicated case. Anyways, since the story isn’t that interesting, at least the setting is. It’s been a long time, if ever, since I saw a movie dealing with a financial crisis as urgently as this one does. But I guess it really works this way with thieves. I guess it was supposed to mean that since people don’t have much money in a crisis, people buy much less and the loot isn’t worth much, either. The score certainly wasn’t great here, which the thieves got to understand pretty quickly.
()
Modern-day realism in an old-school blazer. Dominik changes the rules of storytelling, while also balancing the human and political angles. Bush and Obama are depicted often as ridiculous figures thanks to their speeches about unity and faith in the stars and stripes in this game dominated by Pitt’s Cogan. The actors are perfect, the message short and sharp. Everything stands on the last few lines. America is not a country, it’s a business. Now fucking pay me.
()
Rebellious to the core, incredibly polished, skillfully directed, with a mature script. The story may be trivial, but the political subtext is harsh and uncompromising, just like the brawls and wide-open violence. After a long time, a gangster film with guts, which knows what it wants to say and literally screams it to the world.
()
Great, great, great! I can’t remember the last time I watched a movie and was 100% enthralled by it, and almost immediately watched it again. A stylistically simple script, a lot of talking (but not too much), a gritty atmosphere, a number of absolutely stunning looking scenes (the fact that most of them are pretty bloody murders doesn't change that this time), Brad Pitt being frightening, unpredictable characters, music (Killing Them Softly doesn't have a classic soundtrack, we only hear songs from the radio) and above all the whole idea of showing the current economic situation of the USA through criminals. The mood of the film reminded me more of something by Jim Jarmusch than the Coen brothers. Andrew Dominik just continues to make me happy. Killing Them Softly gave me in spades what I didn't get from the perfectly awful Drive the other day.
()
When you see a movie with Brad Pitt in it, it's usually a blockbuster. But not every film is the same. Even though it's a collaboration between Brad Pitt and director Andrew Dominik. The movie "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford" is definitely worth remembering. But actually, the film "Killing Them Softly" is also a gem. Just don't expect it to be a big Hollywood film, it's more of a smaller-scale showcase of acting, which literally indulges in great bloody effects. Yes, there are few films where a shot to the head looks real, but lately more and more of these films have been appearing. "Killing Them Softly" is a film that handles this perfectly. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2013/02/killing-them-softly-2012-60.html
()
Anuncio