Streaming (1)

Sinopsis(1)

Hannah Arendt, filósofa, pensadora y periodista, judía y exiliada en los Estados Unidos, es enviada a Jerusalén por The New Yorker a cubrir el juicio del criminal de guerra nazi Adolf Eichmann, quien es juzgado y condenado a muerte. Durante cuatro años trabaja, marcada por la controversia, escribiendo un libro titulado "Eichman en Jerusalem, Un estudio sobre la banalización del mal" el cual provoca inmediatamente un escándalo internacional. (Surtsey Films)

(más)

Videos (2)

Tráiler

Reseñas (4)

claudel 

todas reseñas del usuario

español U Hannah Arendt oceňuji sílu její osobnosti, její vytrvalost a zarputilost pří lítém boji za pravdu a vlastní názor. Proto jsem při sledování německých filmových cen zajásal, že se někdo odhodlal natočit o ní film. Není to zrovna snímek pro většinové publikum, přesto si myslím, že to je správná a důstojná volba pro zahájení Deutscher Filmfest 2013. Barbara Sukowa září a exceluje již od první minuty, kdy se na scéně objeví. Cena za nejepší herecký výkon jí patří naprosto zaslouženě. Nejsilnějšími momenty jsou její rozjímání s cigaretou a její přednáška/obhajoba před studenty. Vytknul bych možná délku, nicméně snímek plyne pomalu nejspíš záměrně. Je to tak na čtyři hvězdičky, ale za výjimečný výkon Barbary Sukowe posouvám o jednu hvězdičku nahoru. ()

NinadeL 

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés Another meeting between Margarethe von Trotta and Barbara Sukowa (or Lola, Berlin Alexanderplatz). This time in a masterful dialogue about the nature of evil. The film focuses on the period in the early 1960s when Arendt was reporting for "The New Yorker" on "Eichmann in Jerusalem: a Report on the Banality of Evil." ()

Anuncio

Malarkey 

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés Hannah can be uncompromising and totally emotionless, but overall, she has one main goal – Adolf Eichmann who will probably keep her awake for the rest of her life. The director Margarethe von Trotta has fairly accurately shot the story of someone who wanted to destroy Eichmann in court. Live action scenes are complemented by real-life shots that can make your blood run cold at times. There are all sorts of people in the world and so I’m willing to believe that they can keep on surprising you throughout life. However, it’s a pity that the two hours of this movie dragged on quite a lot. I felt like the movie was trying to analyze Hanna and Adolf more than trying to tell a unique story. Even so, it’s a story about Nazi Germany that you need to know and watch. ()

kaylin 

todas reseñas del usuario

inglés She didn't consider herself a philosopher, yet she still thought philosophically. She was at the trial of Adolf Eichmann, the monster who was supposed to be the one to devise the final solution for dealing with the Jews. Hitler's engineer of genocide. But Arendt realized that she was not facing a monster, but a normal person. At least at first glance. That's not what people want to see. They want to see a monster, they want to see a chimera. Such a monster can't be like them. This is one of the reasons why Hannah Arendt did not have an easy life and why her views were not positively received. Even if she didn't defend the monster, they still looked down on her. The film has great visuals, but more importantly, it highlights a topic to ponder. The quality of the performance, which interestingly combines feature film with archival footage, is an interesting added value. However, the film itself does not bring that much extra and is similarly engineered as The Iron Lady. ()

Galería (33)