Director:
Robert SchwentkeCámara:
Florian BallhausMúsica:
Joseph TrapaneseReparto:
Shailene Woodley, Theo James, Kate Winslet, Ansel Elgort, Miles Teller, Jai Courtney, Zoë Kravitz, Naomi Watts, Maggie Q, Daniel Dae Kim, Octavia Spencer (más)Streaming (3)
Sinopsis(1)
El Día de Iniciación de Tris (Shailene Woodley) debería haber sido uno de los más felices de su vida. En cambio, terminó de la peor manera posible. Iniciada una guerra entre las facciones, todas las partes deberán elegir de qué bando están, surgiendo los secretos y las mentiras de todos sus implicados. Transformada por sus decisiones, el dolor y la culpa, así como los nuevos y radicales descubrimientos, Tris deberá abrazar plenamente su divergencia, aunque todavía no sepa lo que puede perder al hacerlo. (Entertainment One Films Spain)
(más)Reseñas (8)
Prácticamente imposible de seguir sin el conocimiento previo de Divergente. Sin embargo, está peor dirigida, es aún más estúpida, con una trama aún más débil y unos diálogos aún más vacíos. Hay pocas escenas de acción, casi ninguna conexión emocional con los personajes y abundan los puntos muertos en los que no pasa nada. Pero la impresión general de Insurgente es que no pasa nada casi todo el tiempo, y ni siquiera un actor/actriz decente aquí y allá o efectos digitales técnicamente bien hechos pueden salvarla. Todo es inútil, la protagonista se enfrenta sin cesar a un trauma y el espectador se limita a sacudir la cabeza ante lo desesperadamente disfuncional y carente de sentido que es el mundo futurista de Insurgente, incluso dentro de sí mismo.
()
Para esta serie tengo debilidad, así que me divertí casi tanto con la segunda como con la primera. No he leído la novela en la que se basa, así que no tengo con qué comparar, pero creo que algunos eventos y situaciones se representaron mejor en el libro, ya que especialmente en la segunda mitad el guión se enredaba y complicaba. Por otro lado, las simulaciones estuvieron muy bien hechas. Shailene Woodley es excelente como siempre, y el tamaño y la fuerza del elenco han crecido aún más. Dado que la segunda parte es un poco más débil que la primera, le doy una estrella menos. Estoy muy emocionado/a por la próxima entrega.
()
These teen novels from the pen of female authors, wrapped in pseudo sci-fi/fantasy crap are an unfortunate phenomenon of today's pop culture. Paraphrasing Simona Stašová in Cozy Dens: it cost so much money, and it's so stupid. I felt genuinely sorry for the respected character actresses Jodie Foster and Naomi Watts. I know how expensive mortgages in Florida can be, but still, do these two ladies need to do this?
()
Slightly less interesting than Divergent, but still a solid blast in the teen action movie genre. Let the bookworms eat up the political, talky and in-your-face The Hunger Games, I prefer spectacular entertainment and Insurgent is undoubtedly that. There's more action, there's more shooting and there's some fighting, which I consider a plus. Some scenes are built up with tension all the way to the max, which I warmly welcome. The two leading actors are great, the chemistry between them works to a tee, and the highlight is definitely the simulation again, I was holding my breath there. So for me again satisfaction, the action, the story, the pacing all works. 80%
()
Continuing from last year's impressive adaptation of excellent source material is not exactly an easy task, especially if this time you have something slightly less gripping to work with. Given the completely new creative team, I understand the completely different feeling and surprisingly nod approvingly at the omission of drawn-out book passages (the stay with the Factionless) and the fact that the main trademarks of the series still feel divergent enough. However, the biggest triumph remains the phenomenal casting. That year, during which the actors of the main group of youths (Tris, Four, Caleb, Peter) gained experience elsewhere, is reflected in their performances in a tremendous way, and it is their talent that completely makes us forget the unstable narrative foundation on which the whole saga ultimately stands.
()
A B-movie version of Hunger Games, just less political, less pretentious, and much more straightforward with a similarly likable protagonist and definitely better chemistry between the leading duo. Unfortunately, they were unable to avoid the typical trademarks of second-rate PG-13 entertainment: an embarrassingly predictable script, unbelievable emotional dilemmas, and hopeless plot twists (someone is about to die, and snap, the story takes a turn, and someone saves them at the last moment). Nevertheless, it still goes by significantly faster than the third installment of Hunger Games, and you won't have that feeling of being used because your expectations for the Divergent are not that high, though they should be taken into account.
()
Insurgent is in many ways similar to Divergence, so my viewing experience was more or less comparable for both parts. The second part is a bit more mature, more drastic and more rebellious, but even so, the relationships between the characters come to the surface again, balancing out the rebellious side of the film. Many claim that this is a poorer sibling to The Hunger Games, but I like both series equally, so I'm satisfied. In short, a decent continuation of a story set in a post-apocalyptic era that offers one more look at society and people in the future.
()
Okay. A film full of completely unnecessary scenes and lengthy storytelling that only leads to a dull ending, making you indifferent to what happens to the characters. If the book is written as poorly, I really don't understand the tastes of the younger generation and what they actually want to read. I wouldn't want to read this. Boring action scenes, boring scenes in the simulation, and just an absolute disaster.
()
Anuncio