Cámara:
Trent OpalochMúsica:
Alan SilvestriReparto:
Robert Downey Jr., Chris Hemsworth, Mark Ruffalo, Chris Evans, Scarlett Johansson, Don Cheadle, Benedict Cumberbatch, Tom Holland, Chadwick Boseman (más)Streaming (3)
Sinopsis(1)
Los Vengadores y sus superhéroes deben estar dispuestos a sacrificar todo en un intento de derrotar al poderoso Thanos, antes de que sus planes de devastación y ruina pongan fin al universo. (Disney España)
Videos (27)
Reseñas (19)
“Mother f...!" A la tercera, lo mismo, pero más largo, más grande, con más personajes (todos, en realidad) y lo más importante, el mejor villano y un final interesante. Como cualquier película de Marvel, este coloso no pudo mantener mi atención sin parar (de vez en cuando rebotaba mis pensamientos de un lado a otro), pero fue la más entretenida de los Vengadores. La chispa entre el grupo serio y los Guardianes (que están mucho mejor como divertimento que como lastre), más espacio para un Thor más serio (cuya comedia infantil Ragnarok no me gustó), y un reparto diverso y amplio con el que se está bien. Diez años para mantener semejante oficio y la capacidad de aumentar continuamente la satisfacción y el entusiasmo de los aficionados es admirable. Marvel es un fenómeno, me río.
()
Filmový víkend ČSFD 2018, Boskovice. Primero, un gran agradecimiento a Martin y Adam por organizar otro increíble evento cinematográfico para los fanáticos y entusiastas del cine. Finalmente pude ver uno de los éxitos de este año que me perdí en Praga. Todos los héroes contra un súper villano, que tal vez sea el mejor de todos y además tiene un modelo y una voz proporcionada por Josh Brolin. No encontré un momento aburrido, desde el principio hasta el final, se va a toda velocidad, y como siempre, me encanta Los Guardianes de la Galaxia, especialmente Rocket y sus citas y estilo de lucha. Me gustaron mucho Elizabeth Olsen y Benedict Cumberbatch. Pero tengo una gran falta propia, debo ponerme al día con algunas historias independientes para entender ciertas conexiones en retrospectiva, así que tengo motivación para abordarlas lo antes posible.
()
Infinity War combines within itself several excellent (Thor’s main storyline) and a few average aspects of Marvel movies: achievement of the objective is delayed due to the fact that the protagonists repeat the same “mistake” again and again, by means of which the filmmakers incessantly and semi-pathetically tell us what the film’s central idea is, the most robust action happens basically just to cut something epic into the trailer when the directors switch to melodramatic mode (which they do much more frequently than before), some of the dialogue is pretty “cheesy”, the plot becomes more predictable over time, the postponement of the inevitable more tiresome and the narrative more monotonous ... It holds together thanks mainly to the emotionally dense revealing of negative motives, to which the turning points and the division of the narrative into three large plot segments are tied. ___ The movie strives for an uncompromising climax, but the story is not pervaded with a serious approach to nearly the same extent as in Logan’s or Nolan’s Batman films. Priority is still given to entertaining the viewers and not forcing them to think about the sense of violence or the cost of heroism/humanity. I still consider the best Marvel movie to be the second Captain America, whose stylistic purity and narrative compactness that the rather episodic Infinity War can only dream about, given how it leaves some of the characters out of the story for so long that you almost forget they are in the movie and alternates between too many styles (while quite logically not having its own distinctive style like Thor: Ragnarok or Black Panther). ___ This time, Feige and co., like Singer in the markedly more ponderous X-Men: Apocalypse, go to the limit of how many prominent characters can be crammed into a single feature film without it falling apart, while making sure that viewers who are unfamiliar with the previous eighteen films do not get completely lost and that viewers who are well acquainted with the MCU get what they want without their heads exploding. It’s hard for me to imagine where they can go next and it can b probably be considered a great success that the result is not much less consistent and that it generally has a balanced rhythm (due in large part to the rapid and humorous verbal exchanges). ___ Infinity War is not revolutionary and it contains nothing so stimulating (in terms of style, content or narrative) that I want to see it again anytime soon, but for all the money, it is unambiguously a superbly calculated blockbuster that cleverly serves the fans (starting with the entrances of the individual heroes on the scene), making its production circumstances reminiscent of the golden age of the large-scale Hollywood system (a regular stable of stars + an unchanging circle of collaborators). Furthermore, it can be unsettling for the more sensitive viewers who have become a bit attached to the Marvel superheroes over the years (I myself had a rather unpleasant feeling of helplessness and anxiety during the credits and for a moment afterwards). 80%
()
(menos)
(más)
This movie probably has a record for most A-class actors appearing in a single blockbuster movie. But the quality fluctuates depending on who’s on the screen. Scenes with The Guardians of the Galaxy characters, Thor or young Spiderman are really amusing, and the humor quality is often even close to Thor: Ragnarok. On the other hand, Iron Man, Captain America or Black Panther are on the screen most of the time and they balance the fun out by mostly leading serious talks. Which is exactly the reason I can’t give it five stars. However, it’s probably the most action-filled comic blockbuster ever filmed. I felt like the two and a half hours were a constant action thrill ride. Something was always happening, it had a good flow and it was fun. Also, the main villain played by Josh Brolin was excellent. The ending was exemplary, they couldn’t have enticed me better to go see the sequel. I was very satisfied. But I’ll save the five-star rating for another comic book movie adaptation.
()
I can't imagine how it could have been done better. The third Avengers isn't a perfect movie, of course, but with this many characters, it was clear that it couldn't be done without compromise. Fortunately, the Russos didn't make too many of them. The first half, when the film is just getting its breath for the epic mayhem, pushes a little too hard on the humour, but given that there wasn't much room for character development and some more complicated plot, it doesn't really matter that much. Something had to be going on. And then it starts to get more intense and it's something to watch, whether it's the battles between confused heroes who don't know each other, the efforts to take down Thanos, or the epic battle in Wakanda. At Disney, though, they knew that a bunch of characters with no room to properly show off and rush towards an epic finale probably wouldn't be enough, so here's Thanos. The MCU's best and most interesting villain is given more space than most heroes, and you'll be glad for it, because he's not a one-dimensional villain, and Josh Brolin as the purple titan lives up to the reputation build across several movies as a total annihilator, but he can also sell the more emotionally-charged scenes. I could have asked for more room for the characters, their relationships with each other, or some more significant emotional development, but there just wasn't room for it here. So, good for me. I don't really know what I could criticize about it in any significant way. In the context of the "make the greatest comic book film ever" brief, it couldn't have been much better.
()
Anuncio