Director:
Guillermo del ToroCámara:
Dan LaustsenMúsica:
Alexandre DesplatReparto:
Sally Hawkins, Michael Shannon, Richard Jenkins, Doug Jones, Michael Stuhlbarg, Octavia Spencer, David Hewlett, Nick Searcy, Nigel Bennett, Stewart Arnott (más)Streaming (4)
Sinopsis(1)
Un sobrenatural cuento fantástico que transcurre en Norteamérica alrededor del año 1963, con el trasfondo de la Guerra Fría. En el laboratorio donde trabaja, oculto en unas instalaciones de alta seguridad del gobierno, la solitaria Elisa (Sally Hawkins) se encuentra atrapada en una vida llena de silencio y aislamiento. La vida de Elisa cambia por completo cuando, junto con su compañera Zelda (Octavia Spencer), descubre un experimento clasificado como secreto. (20th Century Fox España)
(más)Reseñas (15)
An utterly unique and bizarre retro-futuristic fantasy, an original mix of childish naivety, teenage infatuation and adult sexuality, combined with occasional brutality. Michael Shannon and his black fingers are so over-the-top. I get the Oscars, it's "something different" than what’s usual in the film medium, but I didn’t get a proper film experience.
()
Una secuela libre de La mujer y el monstruo admirada por Guillermo, con un delicado escenario retro y un monstruo único, literalmente hermoso. No se puede comparar con El laberinto del fauno, que era más fantástica, cruel, triste y menos al estilo de Hollywood. La forma del agua es una encantadora película estadounidense de género con una premisa simple hasta predecible, pero elaborada de corazón con un montón de intercalaciones cinéfilas. Beauty and the Beast meets Romeo & Juliet. Un cuento de hadas para adultos en el que el protagonista ya no lee un libro de fantasía, sino que se masturba en la bañera. Un cuento de hadas bastante moderada en la cantidad de sangre y violencia para ser de Guillermo, en la que no puede faltar una mujer afroamericana, un hombre gay, un general estadounidense admirador de Trump o un científico secreto ruso con el corazón en el lugar correcto. Todo decentemente escrito y dirigido, todo en el lugar correcto, pero con un metraje ligeramente demasiado largo. 100 minutos sería lo ideal.
()
Definitivamente no soy uno de los grandes fanáticos de Guillermo del Toro, nunca me había encontrado completamente con su poética hasta el día de hoy. Estoy sorprendido, pensé que ni siquiera vería La forma del agua, y estoy contento de no haberme dejado llevar por los prejuicios y darle una oportunidad a esta película. Me encontré con una hermosa y sin duda específica experiencia visual, que el espectador puede conectar y estar emocionado, o no conectar y quedar decepcionado o incluso enojado, preguntándose a qué diablos acababa de ver. Una historia original con una atmósfera única, música cautivante y excelentes actuaciones. Personalmente, solo cambiaría las nominaciones al Óscar de Octavia Spencer, quien ha estado acumulando nominaciones últimamente junto con Denzel Washington, por Michael Shannon, quien realizó una interpretación destacada como el villano. Pero no voy a ahondar en eso y arruinar una experiencia artística muy agradable. Aprecio la forma sutil en que se abordan varios temas cruciales a través de comentarios satíricos, escenas impactantes o breves - una forma muy elegante de expresar la opinión del director. Después de Lady Bird, mi próximo favorito para los Óscar.
()
I was hyped for the new movie by Guillermo del Toro. A bunch of Oscar nominations only strengthened my excitement. But I really didn’t expect a fantasy premise to turn into a fantasy zoophilic romance. I don’t think this is the first time this idea has occurred to somebody in America but each time it only pissed me off. I can’t wrap my head around why Guillermo himself would waste his time on a story like this.
()
Guillermo Del Toro and his new film The Shape of Water unfortunately didn't impress me and del Toro has disappointed me after a long time. While The Shape of Water garnered rave reviews and won awards at the Golden Globes for Best Director and Best Score, and I certainly can't deny the solid direction, the period atmosphere and decent performances, Michael Shannon as the bad guy is perhaps the best thing about the whole film, but the rest of the cast left me cold. The film has quite a plodding pace, an unlikeable main character who is so desperate that she's having it out with a Fish Man, and too much romance for my taste that the suspense and the few brutal scenes remain rather in the background. Surprisingly the humour works here though (“Never trust a man even if he is flat down there”). As a romantic fairytale about a mute girl who falls in love with a monster it seems to work, as a horror film it hardly works at all. But it will find its audience, a female audience I suppose. 45%
()
Carefully, I expected a mysterious fairytale, into which Guillermo del Toro would pour in a smaller amount, in the best case scenario, and a larger amount, in the worst case scenario, of depression, the main character of his Pan's Labyrinth. However, everything is different, and instead, I am getting a retro version of Splash! for eighteen and older narrated by Richard Jenkins. Among the participating actors, Michael Shannon is the one who stands out the most, although he sells his traditionally wild and scruffy face as much as he can, his storyline as an ultra-negative agent falls somewhat deaf due to unsuccessful family/marital scenes. I perceive that the beauty and the beast are given the main focus, surprisingly at the expense of the development of other characters' storylines but still, this thoroughly captivating spectacle is very likable to me in terms of genre. It is narrated innocently and honestly, and does not try to be anything it is not even for a moment.
()
Set design great, nicely shot, a beautiful creature... and then there’s the rest of it. Messy and flaccid, of questionable artistic value, quietly loud, stereotypical – like it's all set in some artificial town full of robots playing humans. And yet they are all completely horny. I don't understand the Oscars (except for the sets), but neither do a lot of other people, so it's okay. 50%.
()
A stylishly magnificent tribute to old trash films, the beautifully captured atmosphere of the late 50s and 60s, an unconventional romance that grabs your heart, and a great performance by Sally Hawkins in the lead role. I have so far considered her a decent comedic actress, but what she showcased in this film has catapulted her very high in all aspects of character acting. Personally, I appreciate Guillermo del Toro's artistic playfulness, which reminds me of Jean-Pierre Jeunet's earlier works. Then there's the game with details, which you will probably fully grasp only upon repeated viewing. With this film, my poor knowledge of English came back to haunt me because many details escaped me. I wanted to know why the Golden Globes were awarded to the film, and now I know that they are in the best hands. So far, the rating on FilmBooster seems too low to me, the film probably hasn't yet found its target audience. Thank you, Guillermo, for the industrial charm of old times. Overall impression: 90%.
()
Del Toro is on his best ever form. He has turned the story of the origin of Abe Sapien to an Oscar-winning picture that plays with the rules of the genre. Sally Hawkins is fantastic and convincingly falls in love with the creature from the black lagoon. We even get some full-frontals. The perfect, period socio-political commentary (he even dares to claim that some Communists can be good) is slightly disrupted by gay/feminist offerings that somewhat divert from the story. The stylization, the music, the make-up… just perfect. A fairytale for adults in the very best sense.
()
Beautiful, charming, sweet. A great cast, great ideas, and creative direction. Years later, I'm still reminiscing and currently enjoying the comic variation on the "Shape of Elvira" theme. I'm almost afraid to watch the rerun lest the memory fade.
()
A great fairy tale with a deliberately B-movie story, but with its message and how it caresses on the soul, it trumps films that are more ambitious. Sally Hawkins is magical in the lead role, and Michael Shannon has created such a hideously entertaining story that I think it should belong to film history - his ambitious maniac is an example of someone completely unique in recent times. Del Toro's precise directing and Desplat's music, whose main motif you want to constantly whistle during the film, wraps it all into a beautiful experience that was seriously worth waiting for, although it premiered more than two months ago across the pond.
()
A beautiful cinematic caress that delighted me both with a beautifully told sci-fi story from a time when there was no need to overwhelm the viewer with special effects, and with a creative stylistic hand that manages to upgrade the story effortlessly to the demands of modern audiences. Weak on the emotions and with a slightly overwrought script, but excellent actors and top-notch direction referring to the film formulas of the fifties.
()
When I first saw the trailer for Guillermo del Toro's latest film, I figured that The Shape of Water would rank right up there with Faun's Labyrinth in terms of original story and polished production design. Even though this unconventionally conceived romantic film falls slightly short of del Toro's amazing masterpiece in quality and poignancy, it's still a film that won't leave viewers cold and indifferent. I have no words for the amazing production design and the eerily beautiful appearance of the "monster", as I would only be echoing the comments of others. The central lovestruck couple don't say much, but you still get the feeling that their relationship, full of looks, sign language and bizarre shrieks, is exceedingly warm, maybe even slightly creepy, but all the more magical. Alongside the gory, no-nonsense scenes that are a hallmark of del Toro's films and recur throughout his oeuvre, there was room for humour, particularly provided by Octavia Spencer as Zelda and Richard Jenkins as Giles. Sally Hawkins' innocent and slightly pouting expression contrasts perfectly with the demonic appearance of the main villain with the face of Michael Shannon, beside whom even the screeching expression of the "monster" seems more endearing. In short, one of the strangest films of recent times, and one that certainly won't get buried under a layer of dust and forgotten thanks to the story, the performances and the visual styling.
()
Well, I sure have mixed feelings about this film. On the one hand, it had an amazing retro vibe, professionalism poured out of every frame, and Michael Shannon delivered another version of agent Van Alden with his signature charm. On the other hand, I was expecting more than just a weird fairy-tale romance between a cleaning lady and Aquaman. Anyway, I'm really glad that Elisa didn’t work at a vet clinic. I don’t think of myself as a prude, but interspecies relationships just aren’t my thing. On a final note, I thought I could speak decent Russian. Either I was wrong, or the creative team overestimated their powers, and not a little.
()
I didn't know what to expect from this film. Why does a romance between a girl and a monster have 13 Oscar nominations? To be honest, I'm not sure of the answer to that so far, this isn't a film that the Academy would normally award, but it has to be admitted that it's a beautifully directed film, with beautiful visuals, stunning performances and great cinematography that isn't afraid. Yes, it's definitely an experience. And the music!
()
Anuncio