Streaming (3)
Sinopsis(1)
En el Ártico, la temperatura puede bajar hasta -70°C. En este paraje helado y hostil, un hombre lucha por sobrevivir, refugiándose en los restos de un avión accidentado. En un año ha aprendido a luchar contra el frío y las tormentas, a esconderse de los osos polares y a pescar su comida. Un evento inesperado le obligará a emprender una larga y peligrosa expedición para ser rescatado. (A Contracorriente Films)
(más)Reseñas (12)
Arctic couldn't have been filmed anymore chillingly and, most importantly, more realistically. I admire the creators for the way they handled the subject matter. I watched the whole film with great fascination, and the suspense at times almost took my breath away. Mads Mikkelsen gave it all a touch of realness. In his tenacious fight for life, I trusted his every look, gesture, and movement. (85%)
()
Tras una lenta acumulación, la película adquiere un mayor dramatismo de la desesperanza de la situación, sin clichés de thriller, manteniendo los parámetros de un drama de supervivencia minimalista y creíble, digno de la participación de mi actor europeo favorito del momento. Pero no hay que esperar nada revolucionario como las 127 horas de Boyle. [Cannes]
()
Una película de supervivencia lenta y convencional. Mads Mikkelsen sobrevive a un accidente de avión en el Círculo Polar Ártico y hace lo posible por volver a la civilización. Casi sin diálogo, solo pura actuación. Me inclino ante Mikkelsen, su actuación y su mímica sostienen la película. La trama, sin embargo, no ofrece mucho no visto antes en el género, es probable que muchos espectadores acaben recordando Ártico como la película en la que Mads tira del trineo. Después de verla me sentí tan agotado como el protagonista. [Sitges 2018]
()
Un poderoso drama de supervivencia sobre la tenacidad humana, determinación y fortaleza para sobrevivir a toda costa, liderado por Mikkelsen con su actuación al 100% y un guion con la capacidad de aprovechar una situación visualmente desesperada, la hosquedad del entorno ártico y el intento de mantener la energía al máximo. Tensión uniformemente escalonada y endurecimiento gradual de las condiciones, que el protagonista de forma heroica, persistente y positiva tiene que afrontar en todos los aspectos, por lo que acapara la atención de principio a fin, aunque la película se encuentre al borde de la incredulidad algunas veces.
()
It adequately fulfils the task of “minimalist survival in the Arctic”, but not a iota more. It’s just what you can expect. Mikkelsen has to pull and the viewer has to sit. That it would entertain me twice, that I can’t say.
()
Or when the label "minimalist, non-literal, cold, detached procedural" for a survival genre film is taken literally. Like really literally. And that’s a good thing. Speechless, blinkered, detached, pragmatic and bereft of hope and the will to live, Mikkelsen pulls it off reliably together with the impressively chilling atmosphere of endless snowdrifts, despite the somewhat stilted pacing and setbacks during all that tedious step-breathe-step trudging.
()
Europe's best actor Mads Mikkelsen fights for his life in the cold Antarctic in this new adventure survival drama. Fans of survival dramas will surely enjoy this one, but the film is too minimalistic for my taste, and there are no surprises or interesting scenes. Mads barely speaks, so the only thing to praise is his skill and creativity to survive. It's believably shot and everything makes sense, but the film lacks drive and tension, unfortunately. There is indeed a polar bear, but compared to The Revenant, it's not even worth mentioning. For fans of Mads, nature and survival films a must see, the rest can ignore it as they won't miss much. 60%
()
I didn't realize what I was getting myself into until the moment that endless white landscape spread out before me. This couldn't be more monotonous, I thought. But after a few minutes, when I was wondering whether this role of his was outright stupidity, Mads decided not to leave it at that and started fighting with the snow. And suddenly I forgot that there's nothing around, suddenly I was rooting for him and living through every move he made. I wouldn't take that on with an average actor. I'd do it again with Mads. A strong 3 stars.
()
A melancholic journey undertaken by two castaways across a snowbound continent. Everything relies entirely on Mikelsen, who drags the movie along as doggedly as he does the sledge. This movie about a man pitted against nature, which cheats whenever it can, is bleak, but it has surprises in store. Unfortunately the directing has no surprises, which is a bit of a shame. Penna takes no chances and leaves everything to one excellent Danish actor and Icelandic exteriors. It’ll be alright.
()
What I missed there is directorial skill to tame on camera the element of nature, which abounds in Kormakur’s Everest, for example. Arctic is smaller, sparser, more restrained in its production design and considerably poorer in casting. It's not a grand story, but the journey of one man who makes key decisions to survive under extreme conditions. A survival story is always going to be relatively cool and evocative, as the mental strains in an individual's basic survival instincts are a compelling and eternal theme, but Arctic could have perhaps played out a little better with a slightly more colorful story. In short, I can't shake the impression that they could have got more out of Antarctica. Mikkelsen is, of course, great.
()
One hundred percent immersive spectacle. I believed everything Mads Mikkelsen did, and that was the basis of its success. I liked that we don't know anything more about his character than that he's a smart guy, we're thrown into the plot at the beginning and gradually get to know what the creators want us to know. For example, that a man can remain a man even in the worst conditions. Or should.
()
A one-man survival flick with the great (but for my tastes, too nice) Mikkelsen. I highly recommend seeing it in the cinema, as the chilly atmosphere is truly evocative and unrivalled on the big screen. I don't think I would have watched it on my own at home. What struck me was the considerable degree of detachment caused by the absence of any flashbacks (unlike, for example, Boyle's 127 Hours). So you don't really learn anything about the main character and you have to experience the whole tough Arctic struggle directly with Mads. Quite a decent contribution to the survival genre.
()
Anuncio