Director:
Guillermo del ToroCámara:
Dan LaustsenMúsica:
Nathan JohnsonReparto:
Bradley Cooper, Cate Blanchett, Toni Collette, Willem Dafoe, Richard Jenkins, Rooney Mara, Ron Perlman, Mary Steenburgen, David Strathairn, Mark Povinelli (más)Streaming (4)
Sinopsis(1)
Un joven y ambicioso feriante con un innegable talento para manipular a la gente con unas pocas palabras bien elegidas, se compincha con una psicóloga que es aún más peligrosa que él. (20th Century Studios España)
Reseñas (12)
Guillermo se alejó de su(s) amado(s) monstruo(s) y con la gracia de un perfeccionista visual y una representación enfocada de personajes oscuros, bizarros y frágiles, rodó la película más madura de su carrera hasta el momento. El callejón de las almas perdidas es un drama psicológico sobre falsos pretextos que conducen a la pérdida de uno mismo, un placer visual retro en cada toma, la cámara flota suavemente incluso en las escenas de diálogo más íntimas. Le hará pensar en el clásico La parada de los monstruos de Browning, su alma será acariciada con la delicada estilización del noir y las actuaciones de cada uno de los actores, que adornan la película como un árbol de Navidad. El protagonista es el peor personaje de la historia: n mentiroso carismático pero interiormente depravado que manipula a las personas confiadas que lo rodean. En el sorprendente casting de Bradley Cooper, es aún más impresionante y entretenido ver cuán espléndidamente el actor maneja interpretar a ese personaje.
()
Guillermo del Toro sabe cómo envolver cada una de sus películas en un aura de magia, misterio y opulencia mágica, o mejor dicho, de visualización mágica. Esto no es diferente en esta película llena de estrellas. Sin embargo, tuve la sensación de que le faltaba algo en términos de contenido todo el tiempo, que la transición local no salió completamente bien. Estuve tenso hasta el final mismo y esperé impacientemente una resolución que no me molestaría si fuera al menos un poco impactante.
()
I’m not fond of carnivals from the first half of the 20th century, with their bizarreness, the way their tormented animals and boasted about the deformity of disabled people, but the setting in the late 1930s and early 1940s suits me. However, I feel that the story and its plot arc is not so substantial to justify the enormous runtime. I would have cut the beginning at the carnival by half, maybe more, and nothing would have happened, leaving Bradley and Rooney Mara's reunion and , for the final (very funny, by the way) twist, the important monologue of the the demonic Willem Dafoe about how they recruit human scum to play the role of renegades who are locked permanently in a cage and eat chickens alive. On the other hand, if I were Del Toro I'd focus more on the intrigue in the big city, its grimness and depravity, because Cate Blanchett is a great femme fatale and the sparks between her and Bradley are electrifying. Overall, I enjoyed it, but a pair of scissors for the editor would have been really nice. But it's hard when you consider how much del Toro loves the bizarreness of the old fairs and carnivals, he must have felt like a kid in a candy store in their backdrop.
()
Looking at Guillermo del Toro's filmography, I'd say Nightmare Alley might just be his most layered work yet. Set in the 1940s, it starts off as an occult drama within the world of a circus, only to morph into a full-blown noir in the second half. The cinematography is stunning, and the atmosphere thickens perfectly, suggesting del Toro's usual supernatural touch, which he intriguingly subdues with stark pragmatism as the film progresses. It's a bit unexpected, but with stellar performances, this film stands out as one of the most intriguing releases in recent memory.
()
A magical neo-noir thriller by Guillermo del Toro! Nightmare Alley isn't for mainstream audiences and you need to be in the mood for it, but if you're properly tuned in like me, you're in for an awesome magical movie experience. The film benefits a lot from a perfect cast, with Bradley Cooper in the lead and Cate Blanchett also in a very prominent role of her career (the rest of the characters have less space, but Willem Dafoe, Toni Collette and Ron Perlman are good, too). The first hour was very close and appealing to me, set in a post war circus, a setting I like a lot and here they portray very nicely what goes on behind the curtain (all the shenanigans). The story of the wild man is awesome, it has quite a disturbing and sultry atmosphere. Visually it's absolutely breathtaking to the point of being mesmerizing, some of the shots will make want to pause the film and take a picture (Guillermo is a god in visual styling). The second half goes in a different direction, and I won't say which one, but it definitely builds up decently, the tension and uncertainty builds up and the finale is quite uncompromisingly ironic. The film is two and a half hours long and has a slower pace, so impatient viewers will probably fall asleep or give up on it, but I surprisingly stared open-mouthed and thoroughly enjoyed the whole thing. It's a perfect example of manipulation, psychology, scamming and deception with a nice period setting, magical atmosphere, excellent actors, stunning visuals and well written dialogue. The scene where the older gentleman explains to Bradley the trick of manipulating people with the right words- is great. I took away a lesson from the movie, I feel I was on top of things and it's definitely something to debate with friends for half an hour, so very good for me. Story 4/5, Action 2/5, Humor 0/5, Violence 2/5, Fun 4/5 Music 4/5, Visuals 5/5, Atmosphere 4/5, Suspense 3/5, Emotion 3/5, Actors 4/5. 8/10.
()
The continuation of a cycle of stories, which, like Crimson Peak and The Shape of Water, lay dusty in the attic until Guillermo del Toro came along and turned it into a visual masterpiece with the help of a stellar cast, one that critics admire but audiences do not. However, compared to the aforementioned works, Nightmare Alley is more mature, thoughtful, confident, and ambitious in its setting and themes. It plays with psychology, noir, detective stories, or almost a hundred-year-old horrors, and despite the predictable twist, it describes the narrative circle almost perfectly. Perhaps only the screenwriting habit of making the main character make exactly the mistakes that the supporting characters (often repeatedly) warn her against seems unnecessary to me since Pan's Labyrinth. But for lovers of the spine-chilling and immersion into images that look like they have aged for decades, this manipulative journey is a sure bet and, for me, the best del Toro film since Hellboy II: The Golden Army.
()
An epochal experience. It's very nice that we get such an ideal film even in the cloud of this year's Oscar nominations. Great stuff is drawn from William Lindsay Gresham's novel "Nightmare Alley" (1946), which had already proven to be a novelty when it was first adapted in 1947. Stylistically, it is a treat with classic film punctuation, the production design is absolutely art deco and the decadence of a circus setting and a wicked big city are combined. What more could you want? The acting roles, which are a given: Cooper, Blanchett, Dafoe, Mara, Collette... A decade earlier, Water for Elephants was a similar treat. And on TV, maybe Season 4 of AHS or the unfinished HBO series Carnivàle.
()
A rare oddity. Del Toro finally closed his usual toy store and made his most mature film in a long time, if not ever. Nightmare Alley is a dark neo-noir beautiful ride full of strange individuals, obscured motivations and human hardships, all in a phenomenal, delectable visual stylisation, which is elaborated to the smallest detail. It is not a particularly pleasant viewing and some passages drag a bit too much, but it has its highlights and there are quite a lot of them. Surprisingly, the violence can be as intense and experiential as some of the dialogue and interactions between the main characters. Bradley Cooper in an unusual role, which he tackled more than competently.
()
This time, form wins over content, as the atmosphere is superb and the direction is meticulously detailed, but the story didn't quite grab me by the heart. The first (roughly) circus half was great, and since I didn't know anything about the plot (even the short official distributor blurb here is actually a spoiler), I was curious to see where it was all going. Unfortunately, this eventually led to a not so interesting second and third act, in which almost everything was suddenly expected, including the beautifully vicious ending. I'm a bit disappointed because I really like Guillermo Del Toro and he got a dream cast for Nightmare Alley, but at the same time I'm not too disappointed. P.S.. Bradley Cooper's hero is a downright Lovecraftian character, and I' d like to see some of that Cthulhu next time.
()
Nightmare Alley drew me to the cinema mainly because of the cast, the premise and, of course, the name of the director. Guillermo Del Toro's films are brimming with distinctive visuals and his latest is no different, aided by the inclusion of the film noir genre, where visuals are essential. I hadn't read the source material, nor had I seen the original film, yet I had a hunch in the first quarter what the outcome would be, thanks in part to its striking resemblance to the iconic Freaks. I admit that I may have expected more from Nightmare Alley, but I still enjoyed it in the cinema, even if it could have benefited from a slightly shorter running time. I was also expecting it to be darker and more brutal – not that I felt the need to see gallons of blood. Acting-wise, however, it was good, especially in the case of Cate Blanchett, but Bradley Cooper also played his part. Last but not least, I commend the likeable and mysterious soundtrack. Three and less than half stars!
()
The critics are singing the praises, but I wonder if it's not a bit of a pose. I like Guillermo del Toro, but it turns out I think it's only within the fantasy genre. Nightmare Alley is nothing more than a drawn out 150 minute tedious borefest with some pretty nice sets and fine actors, but the rest of it is very bad. The first hour is quite watchable and offers solid visuals led by a traveling circus and freak show, but once the plot moves forward in time, del Toro started to lose me until he lost me completely towards the end. Plot-wise, there's not much to stand on and the entire runtime drags on in stereotype form without any major emotion, action or suspense and with each passing minute you just wait for the film to actually start, only to find out towards the end that it just hasn't. And then I don't know what to rate - big names are not enough to be satisfied.
()
By all accounts, it looks like the key to enjoying this movie is not knowing the source material. Which is the case for me, and so I instead thoroughly enjoyed the gradual unfolding of the scope of the plot and its unexpected twists, which actually makes practically the entire first half of the film mere exposition. As long as I didn't recognize it in the process, though, I'm fine with it. I enjoyed the preservation of the noir naivety and boorish dialogue, as well as the adaptation of noir visual schemes under actual filming techniques. Nightmare Alley never feels like a faithful illusion of a point in time, instead it's very stagy and polished, which on the one hand relegates the plot to the cheap interiors of circus marquees, yet on the other hand invites us back into the most stylish office ever, which must have actually cost about the same as it would to build the Taj Mahal. Likewise video games circa 2010 (before the gritty look became trendy) such as FEAR, Deus Ex: Human Revolution, or Doom 3. Everything was shiny and looked unnaturally clean, including the dirt. I also often thought of Verbinski's A Cure For Wellness while watching it.
()
Anuncio